Re: C++ pushback

[Avi Kivity]

Xavier Bestel wrote:
> In the first case you know that exactely *one* kmalloc(GFP_KERNEL)
> occurs. In the second case you have to browse SuperBlock's constructor
> to check if it allocates things, needs to run with/without interrupts,
> PREEMPT, whatever... (not even talking about exceptions).
>   
That seems to be a case against writing functions.

Why is a C function acceptable where a C++ constructor isn't?

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/