Re: C++ pushback

[Avi Kivity]

[original poster de-cc'ed]

Martin Mares wrote:
> Can you name any reasons for why should we support C++ in the kernel?
>   
1. Porting existing modules written in C++ - the trigger for this thread?

2. Shorter, faster, more robust code.
> Why shouldn't we invest the effort to making it possible to write kernel
> modules in Haskell instead?
>   
C++ is a system programming language with good C compatibility. Making 
the kernel compatible with C++ is doable.

Haskell is an excellent language, but it is not a system programming 
language. Kernel programming does not fit well into the functional model.
> The kernel is written in C and its maintainers have so far agreed that
> C is enough and adding any other language brings more pain than gain.
>
> If you think otherwise, feel free to submit some real code which shows
> the advantages of using a different language.
>   
That's certainly doable, however it is quite pointless since we know 
that the code will be rejected regardless of any technical merits it may 
have.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/