Re: [2.6.16 PATCH] Filessytem Events Reporter V2

From: Evgeniy Polyakov
Date: Fri Apr 07 2006 - 06:31:51 EST


On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 06:03:04PM +0800, Yi Yang (yang.y.yi@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> >>Can you explain why there is such a big difference between
> >>netlink_unicast and netlink_broadcast?
> >>
> >
> >Netlink broadcast clones skbs, while unicasting requires the whole new
> >one.
> >
> No, I also use clone to send skb, so they should have the same overhead.

I missed that.
After rereading fsevent_send_to_process() I do not see how original skb
is freed though.

> >>>Btw, you need some rebalancing of the per-cpu queues, probably in
> >>>keventd, since CPUs can go offline and your messages will stuck foreve
> >>>there.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>Does keventd not do it? if so, keventd should be modified.
> >>
> >
> >How does keventd know about your own structures?
> >You have an per-cpu object, but your keventd function gets object
> >from running cpu, not from any other cpus.

--
Evgeniy Polyakov
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/