Re: CSCAN I/O scheduler for 2.6.10 kernel

[Vishal Patil]

In that case it would be a normal elevator algorithm and that has a
possiblity of starving the requests at one end of the disk.

- Vishal

On 4/4/06, Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Vishal Patil wrote:
> > Maintain two queues which will be sorted in ascending order using Red
> > Black Trees. When a disk request arrives and if the block number it
> > refers to is greater than the block number of the current request
> > being served add (merge) it to the first sorted queue or else add
> > (merge) it to the second sorted queue. Keep on servicing the requests
> > from the first request queue until it is empty after which switch over
> > to the second queue and now reverse the roles of the two queues.
> > Simple and Sweet. Many thanks for the awesome block I/O layer in the
> > 2.6 kernel.
> >
> Why both queues sorting in ascending order? I would think that one
> should be in descending order, which would reduce the seek distance
> between the last i/o on one queue and the first on the next.
>
> --
>     -bill davidsen (davidsen@xxxxxxx)
> "The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the
>   last possible moment - but no longer"  -me
>


--
Every passing minute is another chance to turn it all around.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/