Re: [patch 1/1] sys_sync_file_range()

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Tue Apr 04 2006 - 17:01:40 EST


"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 11:41:11PM -0800, akpm@xxxxxxxx wrote:
> > @@ -318,8 +318,9 @@
> > #define __NR_unshare 310
> > #define __NR_set_robust_list 311
> > #define __NR_get_robust_list 312
> > +#define __NR_sys_sync_file_range 313
>
> What's up with the __NR_sys_yada_yada?

brainfart. sync_file_range() and splice() will get fixed once Linus
resurfaces.

> Except for recent entries (kexec,
> splice, and now sync_file_range) all of the other names in here have
> dropped the "sys_".
>
> Is it too late to fix __NR_sys_kexec_load (since it is out in the
> wild now?)

It only affects users of the _syscallN macros in unistd.h. I don't expect
that fixing kexec will break much.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/