On Tuesday 04 April 2006 10:01, Peter Williams wrote:Con Kolivas wrote:On Tuesday 04 April 2006 09:04, Peter Williams wrote:I don't but I think they MIGHT make sense for cpusets e.g. one set withAl Boldi wrote:I'm curious. How do you think different schedulers per cpu would beAlso, different schedulers per cpu could be rather useful.I think that would be dangerous. However, different schedulers per
Peter Williams wrote:
cpuset might make sense but it involve a fair bit of work.
useful?
a scheduler targeted at interactive tasks and another targeted at server
tasks. NB the emphasis on might.
I am curious as to Al's answer since he asked for the feature.
It would be easy for me to modify the staircase cpu scheduler to allow the interactive and compute modes be set on a per-cpu basis if that was desired. For that to
be helpful of course you'd have to manually set affinity for the tasks or logins you wanted to run on each cpu(s).