Re: mark_bh in Linux 2.6.12 kernel

From: shiva g
Date: Wed Mar 29 2006 - 05:59:25 EST


Here is the source

static __inline__ void usbd_schedule_device_bh(struct usb_device_instance *device)
{
if (device && (device->status != USBD_CLOSING) && !device->device_bh.sync) {
queue_task(&device->device_bh, &tq_immediate);
mark_bh(IMMEDIATE_BH);
}
}

Also,in the below code, will replacing "schedule_task" simply by "schedule_work" work?
static __inline__ void usbd_schedule_function_bh(struct usb_device_instance *device)
{
if (device && (device->status != USBD_CLOSING) && !device->function_bh.sync) {
schedule_task(&device->function_bh);
}

---- Original Message ----- From: "Sam Ravnborg" <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "shiva g" <shiva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 4:26 PM
Subject: Re: mark_bh in Linux 2.6.12 kernel


On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 04:12:43PM +0530, shiva g wrote:
Hi all,
We are porting a usb host controller driver from 2.4.18 kernel to 2.6.12
kernel. We face some issues with
mark_bh( ) call. Can anyone suggest us how we proceed in porting mark_bh( )
in the 2.6.12 kernel.
Posting the source may give you more/better feedback...

Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/