Re: [PATCH] mm: swsusp shrink_all_memory tweaks

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Friday 24 March 2006 08:07, Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 March 2006 05:46, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > swsusp_shrink_memory() is still wrong, because it will always fail for
> > image_size = 0.  My bad, sorry.
> >
> > The appended patch (on top of yours) should fix that (hope I did it right
> > this time).
> 
> Well I discovered that if all the necessary memory is freed in one call to
>  shrink_all_memory we don't get the nice updating printout from
>  swsusp_shrink_memory telling us we're making progress. So instead of
>  modifying the function to call shrink_all_memory with the full amount (and
>  since we've botched swsusp_shrink_memory a few times between us), we should
>  limit it to a max of SHRINK_BITEs instead.
> 
>  This patch is fine standalone.
> 
>  Rafael, Pavel what do you think of this one? 

In principle it looks good to me, but when I tested the previous one I noticed
shrink_all_memory() tended to return 0 prematurely (ie. when it was possible
to free some more pages).  It only happened if more than 50% of memory was
occupied by application data.

Unfortunately I couldn't find the reason.

Greetings,
Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/