Re: [ck] Re: [PATCH] -mm: Small schedule() optimization

[Andreas Mohr]

Hi,

On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 10:13:47AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Con Kolivas <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Probably better to just
> > 	if (unlikely(in_atomic())) {
> > 		if (!current->exit_state) {
> > 
> > Ingo?
> 
> yeah. There's not much point in nesting likely/unlikely. In fact we can 
> just merge the two conditions, as per updated patch below.

ACK, thanks!

> 	Ingo

Andreas Mohr
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/