Re: libata/sata_nv latency on NVIDIA CK804 [was Re: AMD64 X2 lost ticks on PM timer]

[Ingo Molnar]

* Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> in this particular case there's only very simple (and non-IO) 
> instructions in that codepath (no loops either), except for 
> ata_bmdma_status() which does IO ops: so i agree with you that the 
> most likely candidate for the delay is the readb() or the inb() in 
> ata_bdma_status().
> 
> I'm wondering which one of the two. inb()s are known to be horrible on 
> some systems - but i've never seen them take 16 milliseconds. If it's 
> the inb(), then that could also involve SMM mode and IO 
> emulation/bug-workaround BIOS hackery - which could indeed cause such 
> delays. [but i havent seen such a thing either.]
> 
> the other option is that this is a random delay [e.g. DMA starvation] 
> hitting ata_bmdma_status() only by accident. (That looks a bit 
> unlikely though, given how related this codepath seems to the whole 
> problem area.)

i'd exclude this option based on the second latency trace: that too 
shows a delay in ata_bmdma_status().

so my guess would be that this device doesnt do MMIO, and the PIO inb() 
causes some bad BIOS-based SMM handler/emulator to trigger, which takes 
16.6 msecs. If indeed the device is not in MMIO mode, is there a way to 
force it into MMIO mode, to test this theory?

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/