Re: 2.6.16-rc6-rt1

[Esben Nielsen]

On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Ingo Molnar wrote:

>
> * Esben Nielsen <simlo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> [...]
> no. We have to run deadlock detection to avoid things like circular lock
> dependencies causing an infinite schedule+wakeup 'storm' during priority
> boosting. (like possible with your wakeup based method i think)
No, all tasks would just settle on the highest priority and then the
wakeups would stop.

Esben


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/