Re: weird behavior from kernel

[Ben Dooks]

On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 03:41:44PM +0800, James Yu wrote:
> It's a custom board I got, and the official 2.6 doesn't work on it. So
> I have to use 2.4.

I assume that you had to alter 2.4 to work with your board, so why
is 2.6 so much more difficult?

We have 5 custom boards here, and we use 2.6. It does not take long
to add a board initialisation file into arch/arm/mach-s3c2410/
 
> I tried -fno-strength-reduce option, and it doesn't seem to work though.
> Still looking for solutions~
> 
> 
> On 3/13/06, Ben Dooks <ben@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 05:25:11PM +0800, James Yu wrote:
> > > The major reason to choose 2.4.18 as my dev base is that the dev is
> > > ment to be carried out on a custom ARM board, and there isn't any
> > > 2.6's port available.
> >
> > What functionality do you need which is not in the current
> > 2.6 kernel series?
> >
> > --
> > Ben (ben@xxxxxxxxx, http://www.fluff.org/)
> >
> >   'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
> >
> 
> 
> --
> James
> cyu021@xxxxxxxxx
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-- 
Ben (ben@xxxxxxxxx, http://www.fluff.org/)

  'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/