Re: [Ocfs2-devel] Ocfs2 performance

[Daniel Phillips]

Zach Brown wrote:
> > Pretty close race - vmalloc is slightly faster if anything.
>
> I don't think that test tells us anything interesting about the relative
> load on the TLB.  What would be interesting is seeing the effect
> vmalloc()ed hashes have on a concurrently running load that puts heavy
> pressure on the TLB.

Bzip2 isn't that kind of load?

Regards,

Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/