Re: [PATCH] EDAC: core EDAC support code

From: Dave Peterson
Date: Thu Mar 09 2006 - 18:49:33 EST


On Tuesday 07 March 2006 11:03, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> afaics it is a list of pci devices. these should just be symlinks to the
> sysfs resource of these pci devices instead, not a flat table file.

Ok, I'm looking at the EDAC sysfs interface. I see the following
issues concerning the "one value per file" rule:

1. /sys/devices/system/edac/mc/mc0/module_name contains two
values, a module name and a version:

# cat /sys/devices/system/edac/mc/mc0/module_name
k8_edac Ver: 2.0.1.devel Mar 8 2006
#

2. /sys/devices/system/edac/mc/mc0/supported_mem_type contains
the following on the machine I am looking at:

# cat /sys/devices/system/edac/mc/mc0/supported_mem_type
Unbuffered-DDR Registered-DDR
#

Here we have a whitespace-delimited list of values. Likewise,
the following files contain whitespace-delimited lists:

/sys/devices/system/edac/mc/mc0/edac_capability
/sys/devices/system/edac/mc/mc0/edac_current_capability

3. The following files contain comma-delimited lists of
(vendor ID, device ID) tuples:

/sys/devices/system/edac/pci/pci_parity_blacklist
/sys/devices/system/edac/pci/pci_parity_whitelist

I assume this is what Arjan is referring to.
Documentation/drivers/edac/edac.txt gives the following
description of how the whitelist functions:

This control file allows for an explicit list of PCI
devices to be scanned for parity errors. Only devices
found on this list will be examined. The list is a line
of hexadecimel VENDOR and DEVICE ID tuples:

1022:7450,1434:16a6

One or more can be inserted, seperated by a comma.
To write the above list doing the following as one
command line:

echo "1022:7450,1434:16a6"
> /sys/devices/system/edac/pci/pci_parity_whitelist

To display what the whitelist is, simply 'cat' the same
file.

Looking at the current EDAC implementation, these are all of the
"one value per file" issues I see. If anyone sees any others I
missed, please let me know. Here are my thoughts on each:

Issue #1
--------
Fixing this is easy. /sys/devices/system/edac/mc/mc0/module_name
can be replaced by two separate files, one providing the name and
the other providing the version:

/sys/devices/system/edac/mc/mc0/module_name
/sys/devices/system/edac/mc/mc0/module_version

Issue #2
--------
To fix this, /sys/devices/system/edac/mc/mc0/supported_mem_type
can be made into a directory containing a file representing each
supported memory type. Thus we might have the following:

/sys/devices/system/edac/mc/mc0/supported_mem_type
/sys/devices/system/edac/mc/mc0/supported_mem_type/Unbuffered-DDR
/sys/devices/system/edac/mc/mc0/supported_mem_type/Registered-DDR

In the above example, the files Unbuffered-DDR and Registered-DDR
would each be empty in content. The presence of each file would
indicate that the memory type it represents is supported.

Issue #3
--------
I am unclear about what to do here. If the list contents were
read-only, it would be relatively easy to make
/sys/devices/system/edac/pci/pci_parity_whitelist into a directory
containing symlinks, one for each device. However, the user is
supposed to be able to modify the list contents. This would imply
that the user creates and destroys symlinks. Does sysfs currently
support this sort of behavior? If not, what is the preferred
means for implementing a user-modifiable set of values?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/