Re: [Patch] Wrong error handling in nfs4acl

[J. Bruce Fields]

On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 08:57:00PM +0100, Eric Sesterhenn wrote:
> hi,
> 
> this fixes coverity id #3. Coverity detected dead code,
> since the == -1 comparison only returns 0 or 1 to error.
> Therefore the if ( error < 0 ) statement was always false.
> Seems that this was an if( error = nfs4... ) statement some time
> ago, which got broken during cleanup.
> Just compile tested.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sesterhenn <snakebyte@xxxxxx>

Thanks!  Applied to my tree.--b.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/