Re: initcall at ... returned with error code -19 (Was: Re: 2.6.16-rc5-mm2)

From: Jes Sorensen
Date: Tue Mar 07 2006 - 08:08:20 EST


>>>>> "Paul" == Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> writes:

Paul> Andrew wrote:
>> That's OK - it's -ENODEV.

Paul> I can't help but wonder if the particular case of -ENODEV should
Paul> be kept quiet, as in the following totally untested patch:

I'd subscribe to that. It seems a bit wrong to return 0 in a
loadable module if nothing is found, and some of the ones people have
posted patches for converting can be either modules or static.

Cheers,
Jes
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/