Re: [Ocfs2-devel] Ocfs2 performance bugs of doom

[Mark Fasheh]

On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 08:59:50PM -0800, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> So that hack apparently improves the bucket distribution quite a bit, but
> look, the bad old linear systime creep is still very obvious.  For that
> there is no substitute for lots of buckets.
Yes, I think the way to go right now is to allocate an array of pages and
index into that. We can make the array size a mount option so that the
default can be something reasonable ;)

> Speaking of that, the qstr is so far away from the list.next pointer that
> you're most probably getting an extra cache line load there too. Just move
> the qstr up next to the hash list.
Ahh, good catch.

> Notice, those wildly gyrating real times are still manifesting.  Seen
> them over there?
Yes - times from a test run are below.

    Real  User  Sys
   14.35 3.82 11.99
   16.75 3.62 13.90
   32.12 4.06 15.81
   18.94 3.99 16.69 
   35.18 3.96 15.80
   18.66 3.89 16.44
   52.09 4.24 16.66
   21.25 3.85 17.09
   19.73 4.00 17.20
   35.40 3.88 16.60

So this definitely reproduces elsewhere.
	--Mark

--
Mark Fasheh
Senior Software Developer, Oracle
mark.fasheh@xxxxxxxxxx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/