Re: Doubt about scheduler

[Peter Williams]

Nick Piggin wrote:
> Raúl Baena wrote:
>
> > Thank you very much Jon. But I think I haven´t explained very well.
> >
> > I know that now the prio_array and runqueues structs aren´t accesible 
> > for modules, but in the 2.6.5 version they were. I would like to know 
> > the reason, why before they were accesible and now they don´t? If you 
> > could answer me, it would be great.
>
>
> I don't remember them being available in 2.6.5... but as to why they
> aren't available now: it is much cleaner this way. It even benefits
> you because now nobody will break your module when they change the
> data structure.

SuSE patched their 2.6.5 kernel to make the run queues visible in a 
header file.  Perhaps Raul was using a SuSE version of 2.6.5.

> > I could to write the reason in my university job. (In Spain we have to 
> > make a final degree job, and mine is about modules in linux (I chose 
> > this), I would like to show information of the new scheduler, a 
> > scheduler monitor, and these fields are indispensable for me)
>
>
> If your task is about modules in Linux, then I don't see how that
> involves the scheduler at all?
>
> On the other hand, if you want a scheduler monitor then I can't see
> why it would be appropriate to implement as a module (we have schedstats,
> which you can read from a userspace program or daemon).
>
> Nick

Peter
--
Peter Williams                                   pwil3058@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious."
 -- Ambrose Bierce
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/