Re: [PATCH] simplify update_times (avoid jiffies/jiffies_64aliasing problem)

[Paul Mackerras]

Andrew Morton writes:
> Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Andi Kleen writes:
> > 
> > > Also I assume Atsushi-san did the patch because he saw a real problem?
> > 
> > Yes, one which I also saw on PPC.  The compiler (gcc-4) emits loads
> > for jiffies, jiffies64 and wall_jiffies before storing the incremented
> > jiffies64 value back.
> > 
> 
> What was the effect of that?

The effect is that the first call to do_timer doesn't increment xtime.
This explains why the code I have to detect disagreements between
xtime and the time of day as computed from the timebase register was
finding a disagreement on the first tick, which I was scratching my
head over.

There may be other effects on architectures which use wall_jiffies to
detect lost timer ticks.  We don't have that problem on PPC and we
don't use wall_jiffies in computing time of day.

Paul.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/