Re: [patch 2.6.16-rc5-mm2] sched_cleanup-V17 - task throttlingpatch 1 of 2

[Mike Galbraith]

On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 10:58 +1100, Peter Williams wrote:

> If you're going to manage the time slice in nanoseconds why not do it 
> properly?  I presume you've held back a bit in case you break something?
> 

Do you mean the < NS_TICK thing?  The spare change doesn't go away.

> If it helps, the smpnice balancing code's use of static_prio_timeslice()
> doesn't really care what units it's return value is in as long as 
> DEF_TIMESLICE is in the same units and contains the size of a time slice 
> allocated to a nice==0 non RT task.

Ok, thanks.  I wanted to make very certain I couldn't screw it up.
Still, it's simpler to just leave it in ticks.

	-Mike

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/