Re: 2.6.16rc5 'found' an extra CPU.

From: Ashok Raj
Date: Fri Mar 03 2006 - 12:39:40 EST


On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 11:14:52PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On a uniprocessor build this causes a crash in acpi_processor_start():
>
> BUG_ON((pr->id >= NR_CPUS) || (pr->id < 0));
>
> pr->id is 255.
>
> I could bodge around this in various ways, but the semantics of cpu IDs in
> there seem to be a bit opaque, and I suspect some more thought needs to go
> into it all.
>
> As well as uniprocessor testing ;)

The UP definition of convert_acpiid_to_cpu() was left as (0xff), i should
have converted that to (-1) now that its an "int".

Here is the updated one, this time i also testbooted the UP kernel. :-)

--
Cheers,
Ashok Raj
- Open Source Technology Center


Local apic entries are only 8 bits, but it seemed to not be caught with
u8 return value result in the check

cpu_index >= NR_CPUS becomming always false.

drivers/acpi/processor_core.c: In function `acpi_processor_get_info':
drivers/acpi/processor_core.c:483: warning: comparison is always false due to limited range of data type


Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@xxxxxxxxx>
-----------------------------------------------------
drivers/acpi/processor_core.c | 10 +++++-----
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6.16-rc5-mm1/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.16-rc5-mm1.orig/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
+++ linux-2.6.16-rc5-mm1/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
@@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_remove_fs(stru

/* Use the acpiid in MADT to map cpus in case of SMP */
#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
-#define convert_acpiid_to_cpu(acpi_id) (0xff)
+#define convert_acpiid_to_cpu(acpi_id) (-1)
#else

#ifdef CONFIG_IA64
@@ -395,7 +395,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_remove_fs(stru
#define ARCH_BAD_APICID (0xff)
#endif

-static u8 convert_acpiid_to_cpu(u8 acpi_id)
+static int convert_acpiid_to_cpu(u8 acpi_id)
{
u16 apic_id;
int i;
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struc
acpi_status status = 0;
union acpi_object object = { 0 };
struct acpi_buffer buffer = { sizeof(union acpi_object), &object };
- u8 cpu_index;
+ int cpu_index;
static int cpu0_initialized;

ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE("acpi_processor_get_info");
@@ -466,7 +466,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struc
cpu_index = convert_acpiid_to_cpu(pr->acpi_id);

/* Handle UP system running SMP kernel, with no LAPIC in MADT */
- if (!cpu0_initialized && (cpu_index == 0xff) &&
+ if (!cpu0_initialized && (cpu_index == -1) &&
(num_online_cpus() == 1)) {
cpu_index = 0;
}
@@ -480,7 +480,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struc
* less than the max # of CPUs. They should be ignored _iff
* they are physically not present.
*/
- if (cpu_index >= NR_CPUS) {
+ if (cpu_index == -1) {
if (ACPI_FAILURE
(acpi_processor_hotadd_init(pr->handle, &pr->id))) {
ACPI_ERROR((AE_INFO,
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/