Re: [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool

From: Jan-Benedict Glaw
Date: Thu Mar 02 2006 - 15:48:44 EST


On Thu, 2006-03-02 21:39:22 +0100, Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 08:51:06PM +0100, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-03-02 18:38:40 +0100, Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 12:31:34PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > > > Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > It does also matter in the kernel image size case, since you have to put
> > > > > enough modules to the other medium for having a effect bigger than the
> > > > > kernel image size increase from setting CONFIG_MODULES=y.
> > > > That's not very difficult considering the large number of modules that's
> > > > out there that a system may wish to use.
> > > This might be true for full-blown desktop systems - but these do not
> > > tend to be the systems where kernel image size matters that much.
> > > Smaller kernel image size might be an issue e.g. for distribution
> > > kernels, but in a much less pressing way.
> > Kernel image size matters if you try to make it boot off a floppy.
>
> Sure, but the usual router-on-a-floppy cases are similar cases where
> CONFIG_MODULES=n brings at least as much gain as making things modular.

You may want to have a chance to load modules from an initrd with is
on a 2nd floppy.

MfG, JBG

--
Jan-Benedict Glaw jbglaw@xxxxxxxxxx . +49-172-7608481 _ O _
"Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg _ _ O
fÃr einen Freien Staat voll Freier BÃrger" | im Internet! | im Irak! O O O
ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA));

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature