Re: [OT] portable Makefiles (was: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest))

[David Weinehall]

On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 11:09:39AM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Tim Walberg <twalberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > >>	> 'accepted "bugs" not being fixed' is not equivalent to 'package is
> > >>	> not being maintained'... at least not in my admittedly meager grasp
> > >>	> of logic...
> > >>	
> > >>	They told me that fixing would take "a while". If you believe that
> > >>	"a while" is 20 years, then you seem to live in a different universe then I do.
> > >>	
> >
> > Indeed... I had already concluded that. It now seems that in
> > your universe, the time span between 1999 and 2006 is on
> > the order of 20 years, which seems to be a factor of nearly
> > 3 over what it is in my universe (either that, or it's not
> > 2006 where you are, but rather 2019...).
> 
> I don't know in which universe you live, but in my universe software
> that does not fix severe bugs after 7 years or does not publish a new
> version at least every 2-3 years is called deas and unmaintained. Both
> applies to GNU make.

Uhm, the version of GNU make in Debian (3.81beta4) was released
12 December 2005; I wouldn't call that dead (or unmaintained).


Regards: David Weinehall
-- 
 /) David Weinehall <tao@xxxxxxxxxx> /) Northern lights wander      (\
//  Maintainer of the v2.0 kernel   //  Dance across the winter sky //
\)  http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/    (/   Full colour fire           (/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/