Re: [PATCH 12/13] "const static" vs "static const" in nfs4

From: Andreas Schwab
Date: Sat Feb 25 2006 - 05:03:29 EST


Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Hm, how about "inline"? GCC also just keeps quiet when a function (or
> prototype) is written as:
>
> inline static int foo(int bar);

"iniline" is not a storage-class specifier, thus it should be handled like
"const" etc.

Andreas.

--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@xxxxxxx
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/