Re: [PATCH 1/3] sysfs representation of stacked devices (common) (rev.2)

From: Greg KH
Date: Sat Feb 25 2006 - 02:05:12 EST


On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 02:15:45PM -0500, Jun'ichi Nomura wrote:
> Hello Greg,
>
> >>>>+/* This is a mere directory in sysfs. No methods are needed. */
> >>>>+static struct kobj_type bd_holder_ktype = {
> >>>>+ .release = NULL,
> >>>>+ .sysfs_ops = NULL,
> >>>>+ .default_attrs = NULL,
> >>>>+};
> >>>
> >>>That doesn't look right. You always need a release function.
>
> I updated the patch based your comments.
> Could you take a look at this version whether there's
> any problematic use of sysfs/kobjects?
>
> - I removed embedded child-kobjects from struct block_device
> and struct gendisk which I added in my previous patch.
> Kobject registration occurs when gendisk or hd_struct is
> registered. Release function of the kobject type is added.
> - Reference counting of kobjects is done in much symmetric
> manner than before.
> - Added bd_claim_by_disk/bd_release_from_disk inline functions
> to help proper reference counting.

Looks great, only one comment:

> --- linux-2.6.16-rc4/fs/partitions/check.c 2006-02-17 17:23:45.000000000 -0500
> +++ linux-2.6.16-rc4/fs/partitions/check.c 2006-02-22 23:18:06.000000000 -0500
> @@ -297,6 +297,56 @@ struct kobj_type ktype_part = {
> .sysfs_ops = &part_sysfs_ops,
> };
>
> +static void dir_release(struct kobject *kobj)
> +{
> + kfree(kobj);
> +}
> +
> +static struct kobj_type dir_ktype = {
> + .release = dir_release,
> + .sysfs_ops = NULL,
> + .default_attrs = NULL,
> +};
> +
> +static inline struct kobject *add_dir(struct kobject *parent, const char *name)
> +{
> + struct kobject *k;
> +
> + if (!parent)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + k = kmalloc(sizeof(*k), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!k)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + memset(k, 0, sizeof(*k));
> + k->parent = parent;
> + k->ktype = &dir_ktype;
> + kobject_set_name(k, name);
> + kobject_register(k);
> +
> + return k;
> +}

This code looks good enough that we should add it to the core kobject
code, don't you think? Also, you might use kzalloc instead of kmalloc
here.

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/