Re: [PATCH] for_each_online_pgdat (take2) [1/5] definefor_each_online_pgdat

[Andrew Morton]

KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> +static inline struct pglist_data *first_online_pgdat(void)
>  +{
>  +	return NODE_DATA(first_online_node);
>  +}
>  +
>  +static inline struct pglist_data *next_online_pgdat(struct pglist_data *pgdat)
>  +{
>  +	int nid = next_online_node(pgdat->node_id);
>  +
>  +	if (nid == MAX_NUMNODES)
>  +		return NULL;
>  +	return NODE_DATA(nid);
>  +}
>  +
>  +
>  +/**
>  + * for_each_pgdat - helper macro to iterate over all nodes
>  + * @pgdat - pointer to a pg_data_t variable
>  + */
>  +#define for_each_online_pgdat(pgdat)			\
>  +	for (pgdat = first_online_pgdat();		\
>  +	     pgdat;					\
>  +	     pgdat = next_online_pgdat(pgdat))
>  +
>  +/*
>  + * next_zone - helper magic for for_each_zone()
>  + * Thanks to William Lee Irwin III for this piece of ingenuity.
>  + */
>  +static inline struct zone *next_zone(struct zone *zone)
>  +{
>  +	pg_data_t *pgdat = zone->zone_pgdat;
>  +
>  +	if (zone < pgdat->node_zones + MAX_NR_ZONES - 1)
>  +		zone++;
>  +	else {
>  +		pgdat = next_online_pgdat(pgdat);
>  +		if (pgdat)
>  +			zone = pgdat->node_zones;
>  +		else
>  +			zone = NULL;
>  +	}
>  +	return zone;
>  +}

Some of these things must generate a large amount of code - would you have
time to look into uninlining them, see what impact that has on .text size?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/