Re: [PATCH 12/13] "const static" vs "static const" in nfs4

[Jesper Juhl]

On 2/25/06, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 12:01:32AM +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > No need for that. It's just something that ICC complains about
> > "storage class not being first" - gcc doesn't care.
>
> Neither does C99, so ICC really should either STFU or make that warning
> independent from the rest and possible to turn off...
>

I agree.

But, it's harmless to change, and a patch is already in mainline a
while back that changes all occourences except this one (i simly
forgot one), so might as well get the last one and then it's a
non-issue.


--
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@xxxxxxxxx>
Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/