Re: GFS2 Filesystem [13/16]

[Joel Becker]

On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 06:50:59PM +0000, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > --- a/fs/Kconfig
> > +++ b/fs/Kconfig
> > @@ -883,8 +884,6 @@ config CONFIGFS_FS
> >  	  Both sysfs and configfs can and should exist together on the
> >  	  same system. One is not a replacement for the other.
> >  
> > -	  If unsure, say N.
> > -
> 
> Why? Most users probably still want configfs_fs=N.

	What version is this patch against?  This line was removed from
mainline a while ago.
	As to why it was removed, the discussion happened back then.
Basically, if something requires CONFIGFS_FS (eg, OCFS2) and is a
module, then a user is asked whether they want configfs as a module or
built-in.  Text saying "say N" is completely incorrect there.

Joel

-- 

"If the human brain were so simple we could understand it, we would
 be so simple that we could not."
	- W. A. Clouston

Joel Becker
Principal Software Developer
Oracle
E-mail: joel.becker@xxxxxxxxxx
Phone: (650) 506-8127
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/