Re: The naming of at()s is a difficult matter

[Joerg Schilling]

Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> >> >Do you have a better proposal for naming the interfaces?
> >>
> >> chownfn maybe. (fd + name)
> >
> >I am not shure if this would match the rules from the Opengroup.
> >Solaris has these interfaces since at least 5 years.
> >
> This is not the cdrecord thread so Solaris is a no-go in this very one.

I encourage you to read a mail before you answer to it.
This may help you to avoid writing incorrect replies.



Jörg

-- 
 EMail:joerg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
       js@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx                (uni)  
       schilling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx     (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/