Re: The naming of at()s is a difficult matter

[Jan Engelhardt]

>> > I have noticed that the new ...at() system calls are named in what
>> > appears to be a completely haphazard fashion.  In Unix system calls,
>> > an f- prefix means it operates on a file descriptor; the -at suffix (a
>> > prefix would have been more consistent, but oh well) similarly
>> > indicates it operates on a (directory fd, pathname) pair.
>> >
>> shmat operates on dirfd/pathname?
>
>Do you have a better proposal for naming the interfaces?
>

chownfn maybe. (fd + name)



Jan Engelhardt
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/