Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.

[Pavel Machek]

On Ät 02-02-06 15:31:55, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 09:25:27PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
>  > On Ät 02-02-06 16:43:19, Olivier Galibert wrote:
>  > > On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 10:28:15PM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
>  > > > Shouldn't the question be "Why are we making this more complicated by moving 
>  > > > it to userspace?"
>  > > 
>  > > Indeed.  It seems that turning the kernel into Hurd is the latest
>  > > fad.
>  > 
>  > Heh, try reading suspend2.
> 
> Can we leave the playground level insults off of linux-kernel please,
> and keep the discussion at a technical level ?
> 
> Such remarks aren't furthering the cause of either implementation.

Well, Olivier said I'm turning kernel into Hurd. So he instead
advocates merging 10 000 lines of code (+7500, contains new
compression algorithm and new plugin architecture). I'd like to add
interface to userland (+300) and remove swap writing (long term,
-1000).

Olivier clearly did not see the patches; is asking him to learn what
he is talking about *that* much to ask?
								Pavel
-- 
Thanks, Sharp!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/