Re: [PATCH/RFC] SPI core: turn transfers to be linked list

[Vitaly Wool]

David Brownell wrote:

> > And in case transfers is an array, we should either be apriory  
> > aware of whether the chaining will take place or allocate an array large 
> > enough to hold additional transfers. Neither of these look good to me, 
> > and having a linked list of transfers will definitely solve this problem.
> >    
>
> Well, that's the guts of the good example I was hoping you would share.
> I'll be posting a refresh of this code soonish; maybe you can provide 
> a complete patch, changing all the code over to use list-not-array?
>  
Let's agree upon that I'll proovide the complete patch as soon as you 
repost all the patches from the very beginning (with the updates you've 
made).
It's a little bit hard to track all that stuff now, I mean patches, 
patches to patches, etc. :)

Vitaly
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/