Re: [PATCH 02/02] RT: plist namespace cleanup

From: Daniel Walker
Date: Thu Dec 22 2005 - 11:52:22 EST


On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 17:10 +0300, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Daniel Walker wrote:
> >
> > Make the plist namespace consistent.
>
> I think plist_head is much better than pl_head.
>
> However I think plist_empty/plist_unhashed is more accurate
> than plist_head_empty/plist_node_empty, but I am rather
> agnostic to naming.

unhashed seems very meaningless . We're not hashing anything.

> Daniel, it would be great if you can check that kernel/rt.o
> was not changed after rename (as it should be).

I didn't check, but I made no code changes so it should be any
different.

Daniel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/