Re: [PATCH] BRIDGE: Fix faulty check inbr_stp_recalculate_bridge_id()

From: Stephen Hemminger
Date: Wed Dec 21 2005 - 16:24:45 EST


On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 21:55:27 +0200
mikukkon@xxxxxx wrote:

> I did a compile with extra gcc warnings, and found a bug in
> net/bridge/br_stp_if.c function br_stp_recalculate_bridge_id():
> compare_ether_addr() returns 0 if match, positive if not, so
> checking it for negative is wrong.
>
> Signed-of-by: Mika Kukkonen <mikukkon@xxxxxx>
>
> ---
>
> net/bridge/br_stp_if.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c b/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c
> index ac09b6a..08c52c2 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c
> @@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ void br_stp_recalculate_bridge_id(struct
>
> list_for_each_entry(p, &br->port_list, list) {
> if (addr == br_mac_zero ||
> - compare_ether_addr(p->dev->dev_addr, addr) < 0)
> + compare_ether_addr(p->dev->dev_addr, addr))
> addr = p->dev->dev_addr;
>
> }

Actually that compare_ether_addr needs to be replaced by memcmp again.
Because for bridge id calc it wants the min() of all the device addresses.

--
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
OSDL http://developer.osdl.org/~shemminger
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/