Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response

[Ingo Molnar]

* Peter Williams <pwil3058@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> It's not a theory.  It's a result of observing a -j 16 build with the 
> sources on an NFS mounted file system with top with and without the 
> patches and comparing that with the same builds with the sources on a 
> local file system. [...]

could you try the build with the scheduler queue from -mm, and set the 
shell to SCHED_BATCH first? Do you still see interactivity problems 
after that?

i'm not sure we want to override the scheduling patterns observed by the 
kernel, via TASK_NONINTERACTIVE - apart of a few obvious cases.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/