Re: Submitting patches for Kontron-boards with Freescale processors
From: Kumar Gala
Date: Mon Dec 19 2005 - 10:05:38 EST
On Dec 19, 2005, at 2:07 AM, Claus Gindhart wrote:
Kumar,
in our department we have Linux 2.6 kernel ports for Kontron
embedded computer boards with freescale processors 8245, 405, 8540,
8541, 8347, 8270, ...
We would like to start now to submit all these board supports to
the vanilla kernel.
For the start we would select one of our common boards, e.g. the
one with 8540/8541 processor.
My question is now:
Should we try to provide a patch with all HW-features of the board
supported, or would it be better to start with a minimalistic
patch, and then add support for additional devices onboard (e.g.
IDE, RTC, SuperIO, ...) time by time ?
Or would it be better to provide the full feature set of this board
at one time ?
First, I would recommend posting such queries to the linuxppc lists
(linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxx, linuxppc-embedded@xxxxxxxxxx).
Second, I'm no longer at Freescale so please email me at this address.
Ok, now to your question. In general if a given board port touch
files in arch/ppc/platforms/* than all of that code should be in one
patch. If you are touching anything in drivers/* you need to
separate out those patches and send them to the respective driver
maintainers. If you want to provide a more detailed list of changes
for 8540/8541 I can provide better directions on how to submit patches.
What boot loader are you using for your boards? I ask because for
the 85xx and 83xx subarchitectures I'm trying to limit new board
ports in arch/ppc as we try to transition to arch/powerpc. However,
this requires that the firmware provide a flatten device tree to the
kernel.
Hopefully that gets you a sense and feel free to ask any other
questions.
- kumar
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/