RE: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation

From: Luck, Tony
Date: Thu Dec 15 2005 - 12:44:56 EST


Okay, spinlocks are null ops when CONFIG_SMP and CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK
are both disabled, but you still have to disable interrupts, and that
slows things down, sometimes quite appreciably. It is, for example,
something I really want to avoid doing on FRV as it takes a *lot* of
cycles.

There was a USENIX paper a couple of decades ago that described how
to do a fast s/w disable of interrupts on machines where really disabling
interrupts was expensive. The rough gist was that the spl[1-7]()
functions would just set a flag in memory to hold the desired interrupt
mask. If an interrupt actually occurred when it was s/w blocked, the
handler would set a pending flag, and just rfi with interrupts disabled.
Then the splx() code checked to see whether there was a pending interrupt
and dealt with it if there was.

-Tony


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/