Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] TCP/IP Critical socket communication mechanism

[jamal]

On Thu, 2005-15-12 at 12:47 +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > 
> > You are using the wrong hammer to crack your nut.
> > You should instead approach your problem of why the ARP entry gets lost.
> > For example, you could give as critical priority to your TCP session, 
> > but that still won't cure your ARP problem.
> > I would suggest that the best way to cure your arp problem, is to 
> > increase the time between arp cache refreshes.
> 
> or turn it around entirely: all traffic is considered important
> unless... and have a bunch of non-critical sockets (like http requests)
> be marked non-critical.

The big hole punched by DaveM is that of dependencies: a http tcp
connection is tied to ICMP or the IPSEC example given; so you need a lot
more intelligence than just what your app is knowledgeable about at its
level. 
You cant really do this shit at the socket level. You need to do it much
earlier.
At runtime, when lower memory thresholds gets crossed, you kick
classification of what packets need to be dropped using something along
the lines of statefull/connection tracking. When things get better you
undo.

cheers,
jamal

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/