Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation

From: David Howells
Date: Tue Dec 13 2005 - 04:54:22 EST


Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> We have atomic_cmpxchg. Can you use that for a sufficient generic
> implementation?

No. CMPXCHG/CAS is not as available as XCHG, and it's also unnecessary.

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/