Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 01:14:13AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 12:42:57AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > scsi/sd.c is currently getting an ICE.  None of the new SAS code compiles,
> > > due to extensive use of anonymous unions.
> > 
> > This is just the headers in the luben code which need redoing completely
> > because they're doing other stupid things like using bitfields for on the
> > wire structures.
> 
> Don't think so (you're referring to Jeff's git-sas-jg.patch?).  It dies
> with current -linus tree.

I didn't mean sd.c but the anonymous union usage.  Everything that's stuffed
into include/scsi/sas/ in -mm is far from mergeable.  It's really badly done
headers that need to be redone.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/