Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation

[Andi Kleen]

On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 01:01:26AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Can you please apply the following patch then? 
> > 
> >  Remove -Wdeclaration-after-statement
> 
> OK.
> 
> Thus far I have this:

Would it be possible to drop support for gcc 3.0 too? 
AFAIK it has never been widely used. If we assume 3.1+ minimum it has the 
advantage that named assembly arguments work, which make
the inline assembly often a lot easier to read and maintain.

-Andi

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/