Re: [ACPI] Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap

[Alan Cox]

On Iau, 2005-12-08 at 08:52 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 01:39:45PM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 01:33:08PM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > 
> > > Don't do it at all.  We don't need to fuck up every layer and driver for
> > > intels braindamage.
> > 
> > Doing SATA suspend/resume properly on x86 depends on knowing the ACPI 
> > object that corresponds to a host or target.
> 
> Not true.


Actually he is right. You have to know the ACPI object in order to run
the _GTM/_STM etc functions. If you don't run those your suspend/resume
may not work, may corrupt and so on. The only safe alternative is to
disable acpi which, while it would have been a good idea before the spec
ever got out, is a bit late now.

If you don't run the resume methods your disk subsystem status after a
resume is simply undefined and unsafe.

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/