Re: [PATCH] ext3: return FSID for statvfs

[Pekka J Enberg]

On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> Question - what is rule for "Signed-off-by:"?  I'm hesitant to add that if
> I haven't actually compiled+tested a fix, as I've seen too many instances
> of "obvious fix contains bug" to believe visual inspection is enough.  If
> "Signed-off-by:" simply indicates "Yes, this person approves of the change
> in principle" then that's OK by me.  Andrew, do you use the "CC" tag for
> that?

I think signed-off is only used when you either (1) change the patch or 
(2) pass it forward. I have seen people use "Acked-by:" for what you seem 
to want to do here.

FWIW, I have tested the patch with UML.

			Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/