Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][Patch 3/5] Per-task delay accounting: Syncblock I/O delays

[Dave Hansen]

On Wed, 2005-12-07 at 22:23 +0000, Shailabh Nagar wrote:
> 
> +       if (-EIOCBQUEUED == ret) {
> +               __attribute__((unused)) struct timespec start, end;
> +

Those "unused" things suck.  They're really ugly.

Doesn't making your delay functions into static inlines make the unused
warnings go away?

-- Dave

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/