Re: [RFC] lockless radix tree readside

From: Nick Piggin
Date: Tue Dec 06 2005 - 17:35:40 EST


Joe Seigh wrote:

Well, I don't have a kernel development set up so I can't comment on
the specific patch but I have done some minor experimentation with reader
lock-free b-trees, specifically insert, delete, and rotate (no actual
balancing heuristics though) so I can comment on what some of the general issues are.

You need to have a serialization point in your tree modifications so
the change becomes atomically visible to threads reading the tree.

Yes, that is the memory barrier in rcu_assign_pointer.

This is important for the semantics of your data structure. It's not
good to have a node become temporarily invisible to readers if the
tree operation involved moving a node or subtree around with more than
a single link modification. So you will likely find yourself needing to use
COW (copy on write) or PCOW (partial copy on write), particularly on
deletes of non leaf nodes. PCOW is naturally better, especially if you
can minimize the number of nodes that have to be copied.


Fortunately the radix tree never needs to do anything like this.
It doesn't move nodes or subtrees - the only modification operations
needed are to insert and delete items (ignoring the tag operations,
which are done under lock).

So that's probably what you want to have in your documentation; what
the serialization points are, your COW or PCOW mechanism, and how
they preserve semantics.

Also I assume you're returning lookups by value and not reference
unless they're refcounted (which naturally since you're using RCU
can be incremented safely if the refcount is not zero)


It can return either. It is up to the reader to do the right thing
in either case (which will need a note in the API comments).

Thanks,
Nick

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.

Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com -
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/