Re: [RFC 1/3] Framework for accurate node based statistics

[Andi Kleen]

On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 11:08:42AM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, Andi Kleen wrote:
> 
> > > +static inline void mod_node_page_state(int node, enum node_stat_item item, int delta)
> > > +{
> > > +	vm_stat_diff[get_cpu()][node][item] += delta;
> > > +	put_cpu();
> > 
> > Instead of get/put_cpu I would use a local_t. This would give much better code
> > on i386/x86-64.  I have some plans to port over all the MM statistics counters
> > over to local_t, still stuck, but for new code it should be definitely done.
> 
> Yuck. That code uses atomic operations and is not aware of atomic64_t.

Hmm? What code are you looking at? 

At least i386/x86-64/generic don't use any atomic operations, just
normal non atomic on bus but atomic for interrupts local rmw.

Do you actually need 64bit? 

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/