Re: [-mm patch] remove code for WIRELESS_EXT < 18

From: Adrian Bunk
Date: Sun Dec 04 2005 - 14:51:32 EST


On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 02:33:18PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >WIRELESS_EXT < 18 will never be true in the kernel.
> >
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >---
> >
> > drivers/net/wireless/ipw2100.c | 434 ----------------------
> > drivers/net/wireless/tiacx/acx_struct.h | 5
> > drivers/net/wireless/tiacx/common.c | 4
> > drivers/net/wireless/tiacx/conv.c | 2
> > drivers/net/wireless/tiacx/ioctl.c | 441 -----------------------
> > drivers/net/wireless/tiacx/pci.c | 8
> > drivers/net/wireless/tiacx/usb.c | 6
> > drivers/net/wireless/tiacx/wlan.c | 2
> > drivers/net/wireless/tiacx/wlan_compat.h | 9
> > 9 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 910 deletions(-)
>
> NAK, patches non-existent files.
>
> [jgarzik@pretzel linux-2.6]$ ls drivers/net/wireless/tiacx
> ls: drivers/net/wireless/tiacx: No such file or directory

As the subject says, it's against -mm.

How should I resend it?
One patch against ipw2100.c and one patch for the tiacx stuff?

cu
Adrian

--

"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/