Re: fix cpufreq-ondemand by accounting skipped ticks as idle ticks [Was: [PATCH] i386 no idle HZ aka Dynticks 051203]

[Con Kolivas]

On Sunday 04 December 2005 23:24, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> Account ticks skipped dynamically as idle ticks.
>
> This allows the ondemand cpufreq governor to work correctly with dyntick.

I never got around to studying it well enough to figure out how to fix it. 
Thanks very much! 

Cheers,
Con
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/