Re: [PATCH 02/12] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging

From: Wu Fengguang
Date: Fri Dec 02 2005 - 02:22:47 EST


On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 09:49:31PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
>
> Revert a patch which went into 2.6.8-rc1. The changelog for that patch was:
>
> The shrink_zone() logic can, under some circumstances, cause far too many
> pages to be reclaimed. Say, we're scanning at high priority and suddenly
> hit a large number of reclaimable pages on the LRU.
>
> Change things so we bale out when SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX pages have been
> reclaimed.
>
> Problem is, this change caused significant imbalance in inter-zone scan
> balancing by truncating scans of larger zones.
>
> Suppose, for example, ZONE_HIGHMEM is 10x the size of ZONE_NORMAL. The zone
> balancing algorithm would require that if we're scanning 100 pages of
> ZONE_HIGHMEM, we should scan 10 pages of ZONE_NORMAL. But this logic will
> cause the scanning of ZONE_HIGHMEM to bale out after only 32 pages are
> reclaimed. Thus effectively causing smaller zones to be scanned relatively
> harder than large ones.
>
> Now I need to remember what the workload was which caused me to write this
> patch originally, then fix it up in a different way...

Maybe it's a situation like this:

__|____|________|________________|________________________________|________________________________________________________________|________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________|________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_: pinned chunk
-: reclaimable chunk
|: shrink_zone() invocation

First we run into a large range of pinned chunks, which lowered the scan
priority. And then there are plenty of reclaimable chunks, bomb...

Thanks,
Wu
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/