Re: [PATCH] Fix bytecount result from printk()

From: David S. Miller
Date: Thu Dec 01 2005 - 15:13:41 EST


From: Mark Lord <lkml@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 10:55:49 -0500

> Whether or not the count should even exist in the first place
> is still a question for examination -- nothing appears to use it.

I think it should be killed, in all of my Linux kernel
hacking I've never seen a user of this return value. :-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/